Reading the PMI Benefits Realization Management (BRM) I fond my self , hmm… a bit underwhelmed. It is not that it is bad, really. Just not that good in my opinion.

Some things are repeated over and over, some things not lifted enough. Some things are explained briefly, like they are simple even though, thinking about them, they are clearly not in reality.

Our teacher does not seem fond BRM, it has to do with quantifying intangible benefits. That’s understandable. As well as considering that there might be benefits that nobody thought of beforehand, that nobody could’ve planned for.

So, I’m sitting here, wishing really hard that this book was one of those truly great coarse literature books. But it’s not.

While trying to picture how this theory would work in the reality, I suddenly have an epiphany. This might be brilliant! Brilliant!

I’m not sure I can explain the possible brilliance adequately . But I will try.

If A company has worked with BRM for a while and managed to create “the right” BRM culture, they have a good tracking of the development of their projects, outputs, benefits and so on. The roles are set as well as the follow-up. The aims of strategy and each project are knit together, integrated and aligned at some level.

So what does this imply ? We have all worked in companies where you cannot easily talk with management. Where they just seem not capable to connect to the internal company or employees, right?

In A company, working with BRM, the top management can probably connect with all level of employees. They can step in and ask relevant questions about calculated/planned benefits. They can be roll models and connect with employees at any level, encourage them, check status without stepping on anyone’s toes or micromanage the project or program manager.

Doing this will also show the top management’s engagement in the company and employees , but also the support of the project management striving to realise planed benefits. And it will give employees a sense of purpose. And give the top management can receive relevant information from the source that would have been impossible without a connection to the employees day-to-day situation.

So, why don’t everyone do this? Well, I think smaller companies might do it partly intuitively. But going all out, the company needs to be large to be able to support all the administration. And according to PMIs survey in 2018, lesser than 1/10 organisations reported having a very mature value delivery capabilities. So, grit is important. Again.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s